Furthermore, morality has become almost entirely absent in bigger business practice in order to pursue higher profits. Its obvious that restrictions must be emplaced in order to preserve the quality of life for the majority of U. Over the last 30 years, the salary received by the average CEO has increased exponentially.
Meanwhile, salary brings the meaning of a fixed compensation periodically paid to a person for regular work or services from the employers to the employees. Then we also need to distinguish wealth from income and income is what people earn from work, but also from dividends, interest, and any rents or royalties that are paid to them on the properties they own.
So in theory, those who own a great deal of wealth, but in reality those who are at the very top of the wealth distribution usually have the most income. So, his article begins with the anecdote about Stephan Crawford and also then the co-president of Morgan Stanley.
Murphy, then explained that if a person wants to show how much more the CEOs get paid, and of course all of them do get paid far, far more than some other average workers that work in the companies, then a fairer comparison would have been the mean annual earnings of the average workers versus the mean annual earnings of the CEOs.
Then later Crowley, came out with a report by following this more reasonable route and reported that in the year ofCEOs were paid over times what the average production worker made.
Murphy, also said that 32 million dollars divided by isdollars per day, which works out to 40, dollars per hour if we assume eight hours of work per day. So in order to get higher figure of 54, dollars, he said that Crowley must be assuming that, in addiction to work only eight hours per day, Crowford only worked five days per week in his company.
Of course, these minor quibbles about the figure overlook the biggest objection, so what if CEOs do earn more money than most other workers do? Murphy, said that in the free market, the price of the corresponds to its marginal product and the competition is to ensure that workers are being paid according to how much additional revenue they bring in to their employer and the companies.
He also explained in further that the fact that some types of labour command thousands of times more market value is no more surprising or outrageous than the fact where some goods in the marketplace such as house and others have a price hundreds of thousands of times higher than the prices of other goods such as a pack of gum.
But then, he said it is the critics of capitalism who implicitly claim that the market value should have been correspond to the ethical worth. However, there is no competent economist that would argue that Stephan Crawford was a good person because he eraned so much money to the company.
Domhoff, stated that another way that income can be used as a power indicator is by comparing average CEO annual pay to average worker pay, which has been done for so many years by Business Week and also later the Associated Press.
The ratio of CEO pay to factory worker pay rose from It was at By way of comparison, the same ratio is about The changes in the American ratio from to are displayed in Figure 1, which is based on data from several hundred of the largest corporations.
Then they also stated that those small differences can lead to big gaps in compensation and are magnified by the firm size. Besides that, in their paper which they worked on, they noted that the first CEO on the list actually earns over percent than the th ranked executive which is a very huge gap.
Later then, Crowley, raised concerns which may trouble even a genuine supporter of the free market.
It makes sense that successful corporate executives earn millions of dollars, but he gives us some allegedly outrages examples of this trend by saying that the CEO of Viacom, Sumner Redstone, took home about 28 million dollars including a bonus of Then he also gives some other examples like Mike Splinter, the CEO of Applied Materials, got a tidy 5 million dollars bonus indespite a stock slide of more than 22 percent which was kind of a huge number of percentages.
Murphy, said that there is an obvious difference in this respect between the assembly-line workers or janitors and receptionists and CEOs. He also said that far more so than all these other employees, the CEO can greatly influence the profitability of the company.
He summed up saying that yet this difference does show up quite clearly in the market that CEOs and the other executives do get paid according to how well the company does or how well they run the company because after all, CEOs are brought in to run the company.
He also stated that in addition to their base salaries, these executives are often paid in stock options which give its owner the right to purchase shares of stock at the specific price, called the strike price. Given his outrage over executives being paid regardless of profitability, Crowley, also complains about the fairness of this too, even the highly successful companies.
He mentioned that the CEO of Yahoo!Jul 02, · That means some CEOs are getting paid too much for performance. And if the stock market goes up -- as it usually does, and has in recent decades -- that excess compensation will be larger.
Essay 11/28/14 Being paid too much? Wouldn’t it be great to make nearly $ million a year simply to play a game?
LeBron James, along with many other professional athletes, sure thinks so. Argumentative Essay Example #1 Are CEOs Being Paid Too Much Money?
The CEOs were the talking point of the world immediately after the financial crisis in More than their role in the financial crisis, the wage packets received by the top people in an organisation attracted a lot of media attention.
Even now, it is widely believed that CEOs. RUNNING HEAD: ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY When it comes to salary, everyone pays attention. Majority of people want to know how much you make for a living. Salary allows your employer to define your self worth in the company, it allows you to define what you can buy and most importantly it can define how well your career is going.
When the title of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) comes up, you can %(12). Realized pay is what the CEO actually took home and is therefore more useful for analyzing whether CEOs are paid for performance.
CEOs may earn a lot, but most of them deserve their pay for increasing the value of their companies, he says. A paper by Kaplan and Joshua Rauh of Stanford finds that the highest-paid CEOs in terms of .
The CEOs compensation package has nothing to do with his/her future performance and the CEO may not make that much of a difference on whether the company is a success or failure. At this point in time, many companies are facing bankruptcy and other companies are losing thousands of dollars on a daily basis.